SPS header perfect labor storm blog the total view newsletter free downloads videos
Home  •  Employee Assessments  •  Talent Management  •  Performance Management  •  Training and Development  •  PR & Media  •  Bookstore  •  About Us
THE TOTAL VIEW
Written and Published by Ira S. Wolfe               July 31, 2002

A Battle of Ego and Reliability?
Gut Feeling vs. Personality Testing: 

Years of experience and hundreds of interviews may no doubt improve the reliability of gut feeling, but most hiring managers would be hard pressed to prove in court that their “gut” exceeded the validity and reliability of today’s 5th and now 6th Generation assessments. Let’s join this Hiring Manager being questioned on the stand about his gut feeling:

Attorney: Mr. Hiring Manager, what you are telling me is that the purple hair, bolt through the nose, and tattered jeans did not affect your decision to hire and later fire this Young Gen-X? So Mr. Hiring Manager, what are the criteria you use to hire and promote good employees in your company?

Hiring Manager: Sir, we look for hard-working, honest, dependable individuals who don’t have to be told every little thing they’re supposed to do and then do what they are told.

Attorney: Mr. Hiring Manager, let me confirm this. You are looking for hard-working, honest, dependable individuals who take the initiative and follow directions and your rules and procedures.

Hiring Manager: Yes sir.

Attorney: How do you determine if someone like Mr. Young Gen-X has initiative, is honest and dependable? 

Hiring Manager: I’ve been doing this job for years and I get this feeling. After all these years and working with so many people, I’ve learned to trust my gut.

Attorney: And your “gut” has been how successful? 

Hiring Manager: Lately it’s been more difficult to find enough qualified people.

Attorney: You didn’t answer my question.

Hiring Manager: It hasn’t been as good as it was but we're doing a lot better than our competitors. I just had this feeling Mr. Young Gen-X wouldn’t work out.

Attorney: So you’re telling us that you knew from the start that this new hire wouldn’t work out.

Hiring Manager: Not exactly. We needed help and I thought I’d give him a shot.

Attorney: And?

Hiring Manager: He just didn’t fit in.

Attorney: Now you’re telling me that you knew from the start he wouldn’t work out and wouldn’t fit in but you hired him anyway. This doesn’t sound like a sound business practice from a manager who claims to have reliable decision making capabilities.

Hiring Manager: We’re a pretty conservative company and a lot of the older employees couldn’t understand why we would hire someone who had purple hair and a bolt through their nose.

Attorney: Did this employee ever cause any trouble?

Hiring Manager: No

Attorney: Was he ever late or didn’t show up?

Hiring Manager: No

Attorney: Did he ever not follow directions?

Hiring Manager: That's just it. He sometimes just did things without asking.

Attorney: And that’s a problem?

Hiring Manager: Yes, we have rules and procedures around here and he just didn’t follow them.

Attorney: You did tell me earlier that you were looking for individuals who were hard-working, honest, and dependable who don’t have to be told every little thing that they’re supposed to do.

Hiring Manager: Yes.

Attorney: I’m confused. Your problem with Mr. Young Gen-X is that he sometimes took the initiative to do things before he was asked. But what you told me was that you were looking for in a  good employee was someone who didn't have to be told what to do every time. Was Mr. Young Gen-X  instructed in the things needed to be done and then did he do it differently than instructed?

Hiring Manager: Not exactly

Attorney: Not exactly to which – he didn’t follow the rules and procedures or he wasn’t instructed?

Hiring Manager: A little of both I guess. We’re really a small company so we didn’t have job descriptions until we started to have problems with turnover and younger workers like this.  And no one really wanted to train these new young employees anyway. They figured it was a waste of time because they’d probably quit anyway.

Attorney: Do you now have job descriptions?

Hiring Manager: We just hired someone to help us write them.

Attorney: So you still don’t have the rules of your company and responsibilities of the job documented.

Hiring Manager: We’re working on it.

Attorney: So you hired this kid with purple hair and a bolt in his nose. He showed up everyday and on time. You expected him to follow your rules and procedures despite that his hair color and attire indicated a bit of an independent streak. You then expected him to follow these rules anyway but the rules are nowhere to be found. And when he did take the initiative to do his job, you fired him for not following the rules that he was never told. So Mr. Hiring Manager, what is it that Mr. Young Gen-X didn`t do  that you hired him to do. If he did do something wrong, how would he know if he never received instructions?

It seems to me like you found the employee you were looking for but you and your other employees couldn’t differentiate between the skills necessary to do the job and personal traits that have nothing to do with the job. Your gut feeling got in the way of seeing that you had a qualified person and your so-called "good and loyal long-term employees" sabotaged the efforts of a hard-working, honest and dependable employee.

Verdict: Guilty!!

In today’s litigious society and talent-poor labor market, hiring-managers who claim that their gut feelings and personal opinions about job candidate potential are just as reliable as 5th and 6th Generation assessments present a tremendous liability to the future productivity and profitability of their organizations. What poses an even more potentially devastating risk for negligent hiring, wrongful discharge and just plain-old-bad-hiring decisions are the number of  individuals who have been given the responsibility for screening, hiring, and promoting employees that lack the training and experience to do this job well. Many of these managers responsible for retaining and rewarding employees are set in their ways and do everything possible to keep things staying the way they used to be.

Want to read more? Ira W. writes a monthly column for the Business 2 Business Magazine.  
Click here to read about Churn-Over: How One Company Said "NO" to De-motivated Candidates.

Click here to share your comments and stories. 


CriteriaOne is the blueprint that is helping organizations to acquire an unfair share of the best talent in the labor market.  For more information about CriteriaOne, click here.

Success Performance Solutions works with businesses from the small employer to the Fortune 500 and  provides convenient, cost-effective solutions that quickly and effortlessly sifts out unqualified candidates and matches, manages and motivates employees.

August 22-23, 2002

The Solution for Acquiring An Unfair Share of the Best Talent
8:30 AM to 4:30 PM 

"Outstanding"

"There was not one minute that was not useful"

"I used to hire by 'instinct' - now I can avoid the guesswork"

What you need to know to build a "whole person approach" for selection, development, and succession for today's workforce
 
Lancaster (PA) - Eden Resort Inn and Conference Center
$595 includes both days of training, workbooks, 
handouts and textbooks

Click here to register or click here to learn more.


Upcoming Seminars and Workshops

August 13
Strengthening a Critical Bridge: 
Binding Employee Activity to Your Bottom Line

9 AM - Noon    ~    The Lancaster (PA) Chamber  ~  Lancaster (PA)
$60 for members, $120 for non-members

Click here to register

Corporate Meetings, Keynotes and In-House Training Programs

Break Through to Success
O
ur most popular program and combines the best of Dynamic Communication and Your Attitude is Showing into a single event.

Build a Team That Clicks, Not Cliques

Building a Winning Sales Presentation

The Perfect Labor Storm: Why This Labor Shortage Will Not Blow Over

Get Ready or Get Out of the Way!
How to Acquire an Unfair Share of the Best Talent during the Perfect Labor Storm.

Managing to Excel
First-line supervisory training from time management to team building to thinking analytically


For more info, contact us today!


The Sixth Generation of Personality Assessments is here!

FirstView is Inexpensive...
FirstViewTM offers 6th Generation quality at a price as low as $10 per employee with unlimited annual usage - lower than than 1st and 2nd Generation instruments such as DISC and Myers-Briggs. It is also an effective way to prescreen key sales and managerial candidates before using more expensive instruments or industrial psychologists.

FirstView is Quick...
FirstViewTM requires less than 10 minutes to complete and seconds to process. Multiple job reports and interview questions are immediately available. A 6 minute cognitive scale can be added to provide a more complete picture.

FirstView is Easy...
FirstViewTM is plug & play using a CD or the Internet. FirstViewTM reports present specific descriptions of job-related behaviors that are understandable to anyone. There is no need for expert interpretation or special training.

Predicts behavior in 15 Key Work Function Categories.  
Click here to receive sample reports or request more information.

Introductory Offer! Set-up fees waived until August 31, 2002 


Training and Development Assessments
for as little as $6 each


1. Communication Response Style

2. Personal Response Style

3. DISC Style Analysis -  Short Form

Order a SAMPLE PACK 
Only $14 for all 3 (includes shipping). Save $4!  

Click here to order your sample pack of  assessments

Copyright 2002. All rights reserved. No portion of  The Total View  may be reproduced without written permission.