|

As Published in Business 2 Business, February 2002
Test for the Difference Between Average and Great
Performers By Ira S. Wolfe
Shhh! Let's listen to a conversation between Glenn, Michelle and Bob
during their weekly sales meeting. Glenn, the sales manager, is struggling
with weak sales and what he feels is a sales force lacking ………
Glenn: We are barely holding our own. Sales are flat. We are not even
close to making a profit this year. What the heck have you guys been
doing?
Bob: Boss, we are doing the best we can. Everyone is nickel-and-diming
us or has put everything on hold until next quarter. You asked me to make
10 more calls a day and I've done it. It's really not our fault. You can't
blame the economy on us.
Michelle: I agree with Bob. Our customers have just cut back. The best
I can do is to keep calling. But you know January is always slow for us,
and I hear the recession is going to last until at least April, maybe even
longer. Maybe our quotas are just too high.
Glenn thinks to himself. "I've spent a year and thousands of training
dollars waiting for these guys to act with some sense of urgency. They
come to work, make their calls, pick up their paychecks and then wait for
something to happen. If they can't meet their quota, they tell me I'm
unrealistic. When they meet
their quota, they get cocky and expect bonuses and more money."
Glenn: Bob, let me ask you something. Are you telling me I should be
paying you for the number of phone calls you make, not sales? By the way,
did either of you ever register for the chamber mixer and networking
meeting I recommended?
Bob: Come on, Glenn. You read the papers. Sales are off everywhere.
Sooner or later, things will turn around. And Glenn, I told you I couldn't
attend those meetings. You know I have trouble getting up so early and I
go to the gym after work on the same day the mixer falls.
Michelle: I don't think it's fair that we should have to go to those
meetings on our time. Those people know what we do. All they want to do is
sell us anyway.
This volley of blame and excuses continues back and forth for a few
more minutes. Glenn then issues an ultimatum. He is willing to accept that
sales will be off but demands that both Bob and Michelle prepare an
individual sales action plan outlining their next quarter goals and how
they plan to achieve them.
Bob resigns the next day. Actually he calls the office about 10 AM to
say he won't be coming in anymore. Michelle hands in a list recommending
that the company place more ads, more frequent mailings and better
incentives to motivate her and she'll follow up on the leads. Glenn sighs
in disbelief and buries his head in his hands.
Unfortunately, similar conversations seem to be taking place in the
offices of many managers these days. An epidemic of blind-sided optimism
infected the minds and bodies of managers during the last 1990's and 2000.
In their haste to fill open positions, expand territories, and gain market
share, managers hired a lot of warm bodies. The overlooked problem was
that these fair weather employees never really learned to start their own
fire in case of a cold spell. Glenn hired sales people who could sell if
they were given a lighter and paper but now he expects them to build a
fire from scratch to keep warm.
Glenn is not alone. A day doesn't go by without a manager asking me if
flexibility, resolve, motivation, attitude, urgency, integrity and a host
of other qualities can be tested for.
This, of course, begs a question. Do those traits determine the
difference between top performers and average performers and if so, how
can a hiring manager identify these qualities and skills before they hire?
Can managers do anything to develop these qualities and skills in existing
salespeople?
The answer is undeniably yes. Personality tests have been used for team
building since World War I. Recently many organizations have begun to use
personality tests, or more appropriately called performance assessments,
to help screen out individuals who are not qualified or will not fit the
company culture before they hire as well as select-in the right people.
Although few managers would disagree that the information acquired from
personality tests is quite accurate, many of them question whether or not
they actually helped identify a more qualified employee. The differences
between assessments are really subtle, enough to drive anyone crazy. Too
often a test is selected based on referral from a friend or out of
desperation just to try something different. Most tests are validated and
reliable, meaning the results are accurate. The test, however, may not be
providing information that is predictive of success, just interesting
reading. An analogous story might be an individual who is having chest
pain. If a blood sugar test is ordered and the results are normal, the
test was accurate and the information good. Unfortunately it may not be
relevant or appropriate at that point in time.
With the advent of fifth generation assessment tools, cognitive
abilities, interests and personality are incorporated into an evaluation
that evaluates the whole person, the model recommended by the Equal
Employment Opportunity Commission for fair, unbiased selection. These
fifth generation assessment tools now can put job-specific predictive
information about individuals and how well they will fit the position and
team into the hands of a manager with considerably more accuracy and
reliability than ever before. This level of specificity has elevated
talent selection and team building from a science to an art. Fifth
generation assessments can be used for coaching, team building, career
pathing and succession plan development, too.
What is the difference between cognitive abilities, interests and
personality?
Cognitive-Can the person do the job? For example, TotalView, a
fifth generation tool, measures a person's ability to work with numbers,
words, and shapes.
· The higher the individual scores working with numbers, the more
likely he or she is to be quicker and more accurate in reasoning with
information derived from simple numbers.
· When dealing with words, those individuals who score higher will
likely have no problems related to the use and understanding of written
language. They should also find it easy to follow instructions.
· When dealing with shapes, individuals are likely to be quicker and
more accurate than most people in dealing with information that involves
mentally manipulating shapes and objects in space. They should find it
easy to work with plans and diagrams.
Interests-Is the person interested in doing the job and why will
he/she do the job? Assessments like TotalView evaluate an individual's
motivation in working with people, data, or machinery. Personal Interests,
Attitudes, and Values provides very specific information such as whether
an individual will be motivated by learning, money, creativity,
volunteerism, competition or a particular cause. Individuals placed in
jobs that do not fit their motivations and interests generally
under-perform, burn-out quickly and change jobs often.
Personality-How will the person do the job and does he/she have
what it takes to do the job and fit the culture? TotalView identifies four
factors called ICES and norms the results against the general population
based on representative study groups:
- Independence: Competitive, tough-minded, assertive, forthright.
- Conscientiousness: Conventional, traditional, concerned with moral
values, organized, attentive to detail.
- Extraversion: Group-oriented, sociable, outgoing, group
dependent.
- Stability: Poised, unruffled, not easily annoyed or upset, relaxed,
not anxious.
Assessments like DISC, on the other hand, measure the four P's of
performance:
- People who seem to be energized by challenges and respond to
problems tend to be direct, blunt and quick to anger.
- People who are energized by the interactions of other people tend to
be more outgoing, talkative, open with their gestures.
- People who prefer to approach their pace of life methodically prefer
predictability, and like to bring closure to whatever they start before
moving on.
- Finally, people who prefer a more structured approach tend to know
and follow the rules and procedures.
In his new book Good to Great, Jim Collins says "if you have the wrong
people, it doesn't matter whether you discover direction, you still won't
have a great company. Great vision without great people is
irrelevant."
Selecting and retaining individuals who under-perform is unfair to the
rest of team, your customers and the bottom line. Identifying the
difference between average and great performers has never been easier or
more accurate since the introduction of fifth generation assessments.
Ira S. Wolfe is president of Poised for the Future Company and
founder of Success Performance Solutions, a consulting firm
based in Leola (PA) specializes in matching, managing and motivating
employees. Success Performance Solutions is the course provider
for Managing to Excel, sponsored by the Lancaster Chamber of
Commerce. Managing to Excel is a series of 12 monthly workshops,
focusing on training the competencies that differentiate top
managers from average performers. Ira can be reached at 717.656.4632
or e-mail: iwolfe@super-solutions.com
|